CRA Modernization – What Does This Mean for Your Institution?

The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) has been a cornerstone of banking regulation since 1977, requiring financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities they serve—including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. After years of debate, the CRA is undergoing significant modernization, with regulators rolling out updates designed to better reflect today’s banking environment. 

For banks and credit unions, this modernization effort means new opportunities, new challenges, and a renewed emphasis on documenting how your institution supports its community. 

Why CRA Modernization Matters 

Banking has changed dramatically in recent decades. Branch networks have evolved, mobile and online services have expanded, and consumer expectations have shifted. The updated CRA framework seeks to: 

  • Provide more clarity and consistency in examinations. 
  • Better account for digital delivery of banking services. 
  • Place greater emphasis on community development activities. 
  • Strengthen the link between bank performance and community impact. 

Key Changes Institutions Should Expect 

  1. Assessment Areas Expand Beyond Branches
    Historically, CRA assessments focused heavily on branch locations. The new rules will take into account digital channels and lending activities outside of traditional branch networks, ensuring institutions are evaluated where they do business—not just where they are physically located. 
  2. New Performance Metrics
    Regulators are introducing updated metrics and benchmarks to evaluate lending, investment, and service activities. This is intended to make CRA exams more objective and transparent, but it will require institutions to carefully track and analyze their data. 
  3. Greater Focus on Community Development
    Activities such as affordable housing initiatives, small business lending, and partnerships with community-based organizations will play an even more significant role in CRA evaluations. Institutions will need to document not only what they are doing, but how those efforts create measurable community impact. 
  4. Tailored Rules Based on Institution Size
    CRA modernization takes a more tailored approach, recognizing that smaller institutions may not have the same resources as large regional or national banks. Still, all institutions—regardless of size—will face increased expectations for transparency and accountability. 

Best Practices to Prepare 

  • Review and Update Policies – Align internal CRA policies with the updated framework and ensure staff understand the changes. 
  • Strengthen Data Collection – Invest in systems that can capture lending, investment, and service data across both physical and digital channels. 
  • Engage Your Community – Build strong partnerships with local organizations and regularly seek feedback to ensure your efforts align with real community needs. 
  • Train Staff at All Levels – From loan officers to senior management, make sure employees understand how CRA modernization affects their role. 
  • Document Everything – Clear, well-documented records are critical for demonstrating compliance and impact during CRA examinations. 

Looking Ahead 

CRA modernization reflects a new era of accountability and transparency in banking. While the changes may feel complex, they also offer financial institutions a chance to showcase their commitment to community impact in a more meaningful way. By proactively adjusting policies, strengthening data practices, and engaging with local stakeholders, banks and credit unions can turn CRA modernization into an opportunity rather than a burden. 

At Brady Martz, our professionals are here to help financial institutions navigate these changes with confidence. From compliance reviews and policy updates to staff training and data analysis, we work alongside your team to ensure you’re well-positioned for success under the modernized CRA framework. 

Best Practices for Strengthening Your Fair Lending Program

Fair lending has been at the center of regulatory focus for decades, and in 2025, it remains a cornerstone of consumer protection in the financial services industry. Banks and credit unions are expected to not only comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), Fair Housing Act (FHA), and related laws, but also demonstrate proactive efforts to ensure equitable access to credit for all applicants. 

With increasing scrutiny from regulators and heightened awareness among consumers, a strong fair lending program is both a compliance necessity and a business advantage. At Brady Martz, we work with financial institutions to build and enhance programs that stand up to examinations and, more importantly, strengthen community trust. 

Why Fair Lending Programs Matter 

Fair lending laws are designed to prevent discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or other protected characteristics. Regulators continue to issue enforcement actions where institutions fail to monitor their lending practices adequately. Beyond compliance, fair lending programs demonstrate a financial institution’s commitment to serving its entire community equitably. 

Key Best Practices in 2025 

  1. Strengthen Governance and Oversight
    Boards of directors and senior leadership must set the tone at the top. Clear policies, strong oversight, and regular reporting ensure fair lending principles are embedded into all aspects of lending.
  2. Conduct Regular Risk Assessments
    Annual (or more frequent) risk assessments help institutions identify potential gaps in policies, procedures, and monitoring. Areas such as loan pricing, underwriting, redlining, and marketing should be reviewed to ensure compliance with fair lending expectations.
  3. Monitor Lending Data Closely
    With advanced analytics, institutions can identify disparities in approval rates, pricing, or product offerings. Using HMDA data alongside internal data analysis allows for timely detection of potential issues before they trigger regulatory concern.
  4. Review Marketing and Outreach Efforts
    Marketing plays a significant role in fair lending risk. Ensure that advertising reaches diverse audiences and does not unintentionally exclude certain communities. Special attention should be paid to digital advertising strategies, which may inadvertently narrow audiences if not properly managed.
  5. Train Employees Continuously
    Training should go beyond compliance basics and equip staff with practical tools to recognize and prevent discriminatory practices in day-to-day operations. Tailoring sessions for loan officers, compliance staff, and senior leaders ensures awareness across the organization.
  6. Test and Document Compliance Efforts
    Self-testing and mystery shopping programs can help institutions identify weaknesses in customer treatment. Just as important is documenting all compliance activities—policies, training records, monitoring results—to demonstrate diligence during examinations.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid 

  • Overreliance on technology without human oversight (AI-driven credit models may introduce bias). 
  • Inconsistent application of exceptions or discretionary pricing. 
  • Insufficient documentation of decision-making, which weakens defenses during exams. 

Looking Ahead 

In 2025, regulators and consumers alike expect financial institutions to go beyond the minimum requirements of compliance and actively promote fairness and transparency. By strengthening governance, embracing analytics, and fostering a culture of fairness, banks and credit unions can minimize risk while building stronger relationships with their communities. 

At Brady Martz, we partner with financial institutions to evaluate fair lending programs, conduct risk assessments, and provide compliance support tailored to your institution’s needs. With our expertise, you can confidently navigate regulatory expectations while continuing to serve your customers with fairness and integrity. 

Product and Service Due Diligence: Potential UDAAP Traps

For banks and credit unions, developing new products and services is a vital way to stay competitive, meet customer needs, and grow. But innovation comes with risk. Regulators continue to emphasize compliance with the prohibition against Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP), and institutions that fail to consider UDAAP risk during product and service due diligence can find themselves facing costly enforcement actions, reputational harm, and lost customer trust. 

At Brady Martz, we help financial institutions anticipate potential pitfalls before they become problems. As you evaluate new offerings or review existing ones, here are common UDAAP traps to keep in mind. 

Understanding UDAAP 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and other regulators continue to make UDAAP compliance a top priority. UDAAP broadly prohibits financial institutions from engaging in practices that: 

  • Unfairly cause harm to consumers that they cannot reasonably avoid. 
  • Deceptively mislead consumers through inaccurate, incomplete, or unclear information. 
  • Abusively take unreasonable advantage of consumers’ lack of understanding, reliance on an institution, or inability to protect their interests. 

Because the definitions are intentionally broad, due diligence is essential for identifying risks in every new or existing product or service. 

Potential UDAAP Traps in 2025 

  1. Complex Fee Structures
    Even when fees are disclosed, overly complicated or poorly explained fee schedules can raise concerns. Consumers should be able to clearly understand what they will be charged and when. 
  2. Digital-First Products
    As mobile and online banking solutions expand, disclosures must be just as clear and accessible as they would be in-person. Confusing interfaces, hard-to-find terms, or inconsistent language across platforms can create UDAAP exposure. 
  3. Targeted Marketing
    Marketing materials that overstate benefits, omit material conditions, or fail to match the actual terms of the product are high-risk. This is especially true in marketing directed at vulnerable populations, such as students, seniors, or low-income households. 
  4. Third-Party Partnerships
    Fintech collaborations, loan participations, or other vendor relationships often introduce hidden UDAAP risk. Institutions remain responsible for ensuring their partners follow the same compliance standards, making vendor due diligence critical. 
  5. Servicing Practices
    Products may be designed well, but how they are serviced can create UDAAP issues. Delayed postings, inadequate complaint resolution, or inconsistent customer communications can all be flagged as abusive or unfair practices. 

Best Practices for Due Diligence 

  • Conduct Thorough Reviews – Evaluate products from the customer’s perspective, ensuring disclosures are clear and that pricing and terms are easy to understand. 
  • Test Communications – Review marketing materials, mobile apps, and online platforms for accuracy, clarity, and consistency. 
  • Strengthen Vendor Oversight – Establish clear standards and monitoring processes for third-party providers. 
  • Engage Compliance Early – Bring compliance professionals into the product development process before launch, not after. 
  • Train Staff Continuously – Ensure employees at all levels understand UDAAP risks and are trained to spot potential concerns. 

Why It Matters 

Regulatory expectations around UDAAP remain high in 2025, and enforcement actions show that regulators are willing to act when institutions fall short. Proactively identifying and addressing UDAAP risks through product and service due diligence is not only about compliance—it’s about protecting your institution’s reputation and maintaining customer trust. 

Looking Ahead 

As financial products become more innovative and technology-driven, UDAAP risks will continue to evolve. By embedding due diligence into every stage of product design, rollout, and servicing, banks and credit unions can avoid costly traps while ensuring they deliver value in a fair, transparent, and responsible way. 

At Brady Martz, we guide financial institutions through product and service due diligence with a focus on compliance, risk management, and long-term success. Our professionals help you identify potential UDAAP concerns early, strengthen your oversight processes, and give your institution the confidence to innovate responsibly. 

Financial Fraud Prevention: Best Practices for 2025

Financial institutions operate in an environment where risk is ever-present and constantly evolving. Fraudulent activity remains one of the most pressing threats facing banks and credit unions, especially as digital transactions continue to grow. In 2025, fraud schemes have become more sophisticated—leveraging new technologies and exploiting emerging vulnerabilities—making prevention more critical than ever. 

At Brady Martz, our financial institution professionals work closely with banks and credit unions across the Midwest to identify risks, strengthen internal controls, and ensure compliance with evolving regulations. Below are key fraud prevention practices that every financial institution should prioritize in 2025 and beyond. 

Stay Ahead of Emerging Fraud Trends 

Fraud methods are shifting as rapidly as the financial technologies institutions adopt. In recent years, the industry has seen increases in: 

  • Synthetic identity fraud, where fraudsters combine real and fake information to create new, hard-to-detect identities. 
  • Account takeover fraud, fueled by phishing and credential theft. 
  • Real-time payment fraud, as faster payment rails (such as FedNow and same-day ACH) reduce the window for identifying and stopping suspicious activity. 

Best Practice: Regularly review fraud trend reports from regulators, trade associations, and technology partners to ensure your institution is prepared for what’s ahead. 

Strengthen Internal Controls 

Strong internal controls are the foundation of fraud prevention. Key measures include: 

  • Segregation of duties for critical processes like wire transfers and reconciliations. 
  • Independent reviews of high-risk transactions. 
  • Comprehensive monitoring systems that flag anomalies in real time. 

Regular testing of these controls ensures they are operating effectively and evolving alongside emerging risks. 

Invest in Employee Training 

Employees remain one of the most effective lines of defense against fraud—if they are properly trained. Ongoing education helps staff: 

  • Recognize red flags for fraud in customer interactions. 
  • Identify unusual transaction patterns. 
  • Stay alert to phishing attempts and social engineering schemes targeting financial institution employees. 

Periodic refresher sessions and real-world scenario training help ensure awareness stays sharp. 

Leverage Advanced Technology 

Fraudsters are using technology to their advantage, and financial institutions must do the same. Tools such as AI-driven transaction monitoring, biometric authentication, and real-time analytics can help institutions detect fraud faster and more accurately. 

At the same time, smaller banks and credit unions should carefully evaluate which tools fit their size, customer base, and budget—striking a balance between cutting-edge solutions and practical implementation. 

Collaborate Across the Industry 

No institution can fight fraud alone. Banks and credit unions should leverage industry groups, regulatory resources, and peer networks to share intelligence and strengthen defenses. Participation in associations such as the NDBA, ICBND, SDBA, and BHCA can provide valuable access to training, updates, and best practices. 

Building a Proactive Culture 

Ultimately, the most effective fraud prevention strategy is a proactive one—where leadership sets the tone, employees understand their responsibilities, and technology and controls work together seamlessly. 

Looking Ahead 

In 2025, fraud prevention is no longer just about compliance—it’s about protecting customer trust and ensuring long-term stability. By staying ahead of emerging fraud trends, reinforcing controls, investing in employee training, and leveraging advanced technology, financial institutions can reduce risk and respond quickly when fraud attempts occur. 

At Brady Martz, we are committed to helping financial institutions build resilient fraud prevention programs. From internal audits and compliance consulting to staff training and technology guidance, our professionals provide the tools and expertise to keep your institution strong, secure, and ready for the future. 

What the Big Beautiful Bill Means for Banks, Credit Unions, & Their Leadership Teams

The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), enacted July 4, 2025, introduces several compelling tax, regulatory, and consumer finance changes that directly impact financial institutions. Here’s what you need to know—and act on.

1. Mortgage Lending: Permanent $750,000 Cap

The bill makes permanent the $750,000 cap on home mortgage indebtedness for individuals. While not as headline-grabbing as new deductions, this stability in the mortgage interest deduction should inform lending strategies and client communication moving forward.

Suggested Actions:

  • Review mortgage product offerings to ensure alignment with the permanent cap.
  • Update marketing materials to highlight long-term tax stability for borrowers.
  • Train lending teams on how to position this change with clients.

2. Agricultural Real Estate Lending: 25% Interest Income Exclusion

OBBB adds Section 139L to the Internal Revenue Code, enabling qualified lenders to exclude 25% of interest income earned on new loans secured by rural or agricultural real estate, originated after July 4, 2025. This exclusion can create a meaningful pricing advantage in rural and ag markets.

Suggested Actions:

  • Implement tracking systems for qualified ag loans in origination software.
  • Consider lowering rates up to win competitive rural/ag deals.
  • Educate loan officers and relationship managers on qualification criteria.

3. Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction Made Permanent

The bill permanently codifies the Qualified Business Income deduction of 20% for pass-through entities, greatly benefitting business-owner clients.

Suggested Actions:

  • Develop targeted campaigns for business-owner clients highlighting tax savings.
  • Collaborate with tax advisors to bundle financing and advisory offerings.
  • Host educational webinars or events for pass-through business owners. 

4. “Trump Accounts” (Assumed Tax-Advantaged Accounts)

If OBBB introduced new tax-advantaged savings or investment vehicles—informally referred to as ‘Trump Accounts’—these may present novel product and advisory opportunities for institutions.

Suggested Actions:

  • Monitor regulatory guidance closely to define compliant offerings.
  • Plan pilot programs to test consumer interest and product fit.
  • Integrate these accounts into broader wealth and savings strategies.

5. Bonus Depreciation & Section 179 Enhancements

OBBB permanently reinstates 100% bonus depreciation and raises the Section 179 expensing limit to $2.5 million. These incentives boost demand for equipment financing, particularly in capex-heavy industries.

Suggested Actions:

  • Target commercial clients in manufacturing, agriculture, and construction.
  • Create financing packages specifically tailored to asset acquisition timing.
  • Train commercial lenders on tax-advantaged financing conversations.

6. Regulatory Relief for Mid‑Sized Institutions

The bill eases call‑report cycles, stress-testing thresholds, and capital treatment of some tax-advantaged assets for banks under $20 billion in assets. Specifically: 1) Slashed CFPB Funding Cap from 12% to approximately 5-6.5% – implying a trend towards more deregulation; and 2) postponed the implementation of the Small Business Lending Data Rule (Section 1071), which required detailed collection and reporting of small business lending data, significantly reducing the compliance burden on financial institutions.

Suggested Actions:

  • Reassess compliance workflows to capitalize on new efficiencies.
  • Explore reinvesting freed-up resources into lending or tech upgrades.
  • Review capital planning in light of simplified treatment rules.

7. Green & Community Reinvestment (CRA/ESG) Enhancements

OBBB expands CRA eligibility for energy-efficient and affordable housing in federally designated green corridors, providing enhanced CRA credit.

Suggested Actions:

  • Identify local projects eligible for enhanced CRA credit.
  • Partner with municipalities and developers to co-lend on green projects.
  • Adjust internal tracking to capture and report qualifying activity.

8. Expanded Lending Incentives

One of the most immediate impacts of the OBBB is the consumer interest deduction on auto and home improvement loans (up to $10,000 annually), available from 2025 through 2028. This provision is designed to stimulate domestic consumption and has clear implications for bank and credit union lending programs.

Suggested Action:

  • Institutions should consider how to reposition their consumer loan marketing and underwriting criteria to capture increased demand—especially for U.S.-manufactured products and housing upgrades.

Building Trust with Millennials: Financial Institutions’ Strategies for Customer Retention

Millennials represent one of the most vital customer segments for banks and credit unions today. As they increasingly take control of their finances, it is essential for financial institutions to understand their preferences and earn their trust. Establishing this trust is crucial to retaining millennial customers over the long term. 

Why Millennials Matter to Financial Institutions 

Millennials are digitally savvy and expect easy, fast, and convenient banking options. They highly value transparency, honesty, personalized service, and want to engage with institutions that share their social and environmental values. Because their preferences differ from previous generations, meeting these expectations is essential for building loyalty, increasing lifetime customer value, and encouraging strong word-of-mouth referrals. 

How Financial Institutions Can Build Trust with Millennials 

  1. Provide Easy-to-Use Digital Tools
    Millennials want to manage their money anytime, anywhere through mobile apps and online banking. Financial institutions should offer simple, secure digital services that work well on smartphones and computers.
  2. Be Clear and Honest
    Hidden fees or confusing terms can break trust quickly. Financial institutions should communicate clearly about fees, products, and services. Using email, social media, and chat can help keep communication open and transparent.
  3. Personalize Services
    Millennials want financial products that fit their needs — whether that’s help with student loans, buying a home, or saving for retirement. Using customer data to tailor offers makes millennials feel valued and understood.
  4. Show Commitment to Social Causes
    Many millennials support companies that care about the environment, social justice, and their communities. Financial institutions involved in these causes can build stronger connections with millennial customers.
  5. Offer Financial Education
    Millennials often need guidance on financial topics. Providing easy-to-understand resources like articles, videos, and workshops helps build trust and empowers customers to make good financial choices.

Why It Matters Long-Term 

Millennials are poised to become the largest segment of banking customers in the near future. Institutions that successfully build trust with this generation today will benefit from sustained loyalty, reduced acquisition costs, and steady growth over the years ahead. 

How Brady Martz Can Help 

At Brady Martz, we understand the unique challenges and opportunities in connecting with millennial customers. We partner with financial institutions to enhance digital capabilities, improve customer experiences, ensure regulatory compliance, and analyze market trends. Let us help you cultivate lasting trust with millennials and position your institution for long-term success. 

Balancing Profitability and Compliance in the Age of Regulation

Financial institutions today face an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. From evolving consumer protection laws to heightened anti-money laundering (AML) requirements and cybersecurity mandates, compliance is more demanding than ever. At the same time, institutions must maintain strong profitability to remain competitive and continue serving their customers effectively. 

Striking the right balance between profitability and compliance is critical—and challenging. Failing to meet regulatory expectations can lead to costly fines, reputational damage, and operational setbacks. Conversely, over-investing in compliance without strategic alignment can strain resources and reduce profitability. 

In this article, we explore key considerations and best practices for financial institutions aiming to navigate the intersection of regulatory compliance and financial performance in 2025. 

Understanding the Regulatory Environment 

The regulatory framework for financial institutions continues to evolve rapidly. Key drivers include: 

  • Increased Regulatory Scrutiny: Agencies like the Federal Reserve, OCC, and CFPB are enhancing oversight and enforcement, with a focus on consumer protection, data security, and financial stability. 
  • AML and BSA Modernization: Updates to anti-money laundering rules emphasize risk-based approaches and improved information sharing. 
  • Cybersecurity and Data Privacy: Institutions must safeguard sensitive customer data against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. 
  • Sustainability and ESG Reporting: Growing expectations around environmental, social, and governance transparency are influencing regulatory priorities. 

Staying current with these shifting requirements is a major task that demands both expertise and agility. 

The Profitability Challenge 

Profitability in financial institutions depends on efficient operations, prudent risk-taking, and customer-centric growth strategies. However, compliance obligations often require significant investments in technology, personnel, and process enhancements. This can increase operational costs and affect margins—particularly for smaller institutions with limited resources. 

The challenge lies in integrating compliance into the broader business strategy rather than treating it as a standalone cost center. 

Strategies to Balance Profitability and Compliance 

  1. Adopt a Risk-Based Compliance Approach
    Tailoring compliance efforts to the institution’s unique risk profile allows for more efficient allocation of resources. Focus on high-risk areas while automating or streamlining lower-risk processes. 
  1. Leverage Technology and Automation
    Investing in advanced compliance technologies—such as AI-driven transaction monitoring, automated reporting tools, and centralized risk management platforms—can reduce manual workload, improve accuracy, and lower costs over time. 
  1. Enhance Cross-Functional Collaboration
    Compliance should not be siloed within a single department. Integrate compliance teams with risk management, finance, and operations to foster a holistic view of risks and opportunities. 
  1. Continuous Training and Culture Building
    Promote a culture of compliance throughout the organization by providing regular training and emphasizing the strategic value of compliance in protecting the institution and its customers. 
  1. Regularly Review and Optimize Processes
    Periodic assessments of compliance programs help identify inefficiencies and areas for improvement. Use insights from audits, exams, and internal reviews to fine-tune procedures. 

The Role of Leadership 

Leadership commitment is essential to balance profitability and compliance. Executives and boards must set clear expectations, allocate adequate resources, and champion compliance as a strategic priority—not just a regulatory necessity. 

Looking Ahead 

As regulatory complexity grows, financial institutions that successfully balance profitability and compliance will be better positioned for sustainable growth—achieving this balance requires ongoing effort, innovation, and strategic alignment. At Brady Martz, we understand these challenges and work closely with financial institutions to navigate regulatory requirements, optimize operations, and strengthen financial performance—providing tailored guidance and solutions that support long-term success in today’s evolving regulatory landscape. 

Effectively Manage Your Service Providers: Best Practices for Financial Institutions

In today’s complex financial environment, banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions rely heavily on third-party service providers to support critical operations—from IT and cybersecurity to loan servicing and compliance functions. While these partnerships bring valuable expertise and efficiency, they also introduce risks that require careful management. 

Effectively managing third-party relationships is not just a best practice—it’s an essential component of operational resilience, regulatory compliance, and reputational protection. In this article, we outline key tips to help financial institutions build strong, transparent, and risk-aware partnerships with their service providers. 

Why Third-Party Management Matters 

Outsourcing certain functions enables institutions to focus on their core business while accessing specialized skills. However, third-party relationships also bring potential vulnerabilities, including: 

  • Operational disruptions if a provider fails to deliver 
  • Data breaches and cybersecurity incidents 
  • Compliance gaps that can lead to regulatory penalties 
  • Reputational damage if vendors do not meet standards 

Regulators have increasingly emphasized third-party risk management as part of overall risk frameworks. Effective oversight helps institutions maintain control, reduce surprises, and safeguard customers and stakeholders. 

Tips for Effectively Managing Service Providers 

1. Conduct Thorough Due Diligence Before Engagement 

Before selecting a vendor, perform comprehensive due diligence. Assess their financial stability, reputation, compliance track record, and security controls. Ask for documentation such as audit reports, certifications (e.g., SOC 2), and references to validate their capabilities. 

2. Clearly Define Roles, Expectations, and Responsibilities 

Draft detailed contracts that specify service levels, data protection requirements, compliance obligations, and reporting cadence. Clearly outlining expectations up front helps avoid misunderstandings and sets the foundation for accountability. 

3. Establish Ongoing Monitoring and Communication 

Regularly review vendor performance through scheduled check-ins, service level agreement (SLA) metrics, and risk assessments. Open communication channels ensure issues are identified early and resolved promptly. 

4. Assess and Mitigate Cybersecurity Risks 

Third-party cyber risk is a top concern for financial institutions. Require vendors to adhere to strong cybersecurity practices, including encryption, access controls, and incident response plans. Incorporate these requirements into contracts and conduct periodic security reviews. 

5. Prepare for Continuity and Incident Response 

Work with vendors to develop business continuity and disaster recovery plans. Ensure that service providers have robust backup procedures and that your institution can quickly respond if disruptions occur. 

6. Keep Documentation and Compliance Records Up to Date 

Maintain organized records of contracts, due diligence findings, monitoring reports, and any incidents involving service providers. This documentation is vital for regulatory exams and internal audits. 

Building Strong and Resilient Partnerships 

Successful third-party management is a continuous process that requires collaboration, transparency, and strategic oversight. Institutions that invest in these relationships can leverage vendor expertise while minimizing risk exposure. 

At Brady Martz, we understand the complexities financial institutions face in managing third-party relationships. Our team offers expert guidance on vendor due diligence, risk assessments, contract reviews, and ongoing monitoring to help you build strong, compliant, and resilient partnerships. We work alongside you to mitigate risks and ensure your institution stays secure and regulatory-ready. 

Mergers and Acquisitions in the Financial Sector: Navigating Growth in 2025

As the financial services industry continues to evolve, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) remain a key growth strategy for banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions looking to scale operations, expand geographic reach, or stay competitive in a tightening regulatory environment. 

In 2025, the M&A landscape is being shaped by rising interest rates, shifting customer expectations, rapid digitization, and mounting pressure to achieve operational efficiency. For many institutions, strategic consolidation presents both opportunity and risk—making careful planning more important than ever. 

What’s Driving M&A Activity in 2025? 

While overall M&A activity cooled slightly in 2024, the financial sector continues to see steady consolidation, particularly among community banks and credit unions. Several factors are contributing to this continued momentum: 

  • Economic Pressures
    Persistent inflation, rising interest rates, and margin compression are prompting many institutions to look for scale. Merging can help reduce overhead, increase pricing power, and strengthen financial resilience. 
  • Succession Planning Challenges
    Many smaller institutions are facing leadership transitions as longtime executives retire. Without clear internal successors, merging with a like-minded institution can ensure continued service to members or customers. 
  • Regulatory Burden and Compliance Costs
    Keeping up with regulatory demands—especially around cybersecurity, anti-money laundering (AML), and capital adequacy—requires significant investment. M&A can help institutions share these costs and leverage more robust compliance infrastructure. 
  • Technology Transformation
    The need to invest in digital banking platforms, data analytics, and automation continues to drive strategic mergers. Institutions often seek partners with complementary capabilities or systems to accelerate digital progress. 

Key Considerations for Financial Institutions Exploring M&A 

Mergers can unlock long-term value—but only when approached strategically. Here are a few best practices for institutions considering a transaction in today’s environment: 

1. Align on Culture and Mission 

Cultural alignment remains one of the most critical (and overlooked) elements in M&A. Successful integrations often hinge on shared values, communication styles, and approaches to customer service. Institutions should evaluate cultural compatibility early in the process to avoid friction later. 

2. Conduct Robust Due Diligence 

From loan portfolio performance and asset quality to cybersecurity protocols and vendor contracts, thorough due diligence is essential. Institutions must assess both financial health and operational readiness to uncover any red flags before moving forward. 

3. Evaluate Technology and Integration Readiness 

Integrating systems and platforms is often one of the most complex—and expensive—components of a merger. Institutions should map out how core banking systems, digital platforms, and data warehouses will be combined, and identify any gaps that need to be addressed post-merger. 

4. Communicate with Stakeholders Early and Often 

Transparent communication with employees, customers, regulators, and the community is vital. A well-crafted communications plan helps manage expectations and reduce uncertainty during the transition period. 

5. Plan for Regulatory Approval and Timelines 

Regulatory review remains a key step in any M&A deal. Institutions should prepare early by anticipating potential questions from federal and state agencies and ensuring all compliance documentation is in order. 

The Road Ahead: Growth Through Smart Consolidation 

As financial institutions adapt to economic headwinds and rising customer expectations, M&A continues to offer a strategic path forward—when executed with care. Institutions that approach consolidation with a focus on long-term value, stakeholder impact, and operational alignment are best positioned to navigate the complexities of the market and emerge stronger on the other side. 

At Brady Martz, our professionals work alongside financial institutions through every phase of the M&A process—from due diligence and financial modeling to regulatory support and integration planning. We understand the unique considerations facing banks and credit unions in today’s environment, and we’re here to help you navigate growth with confidence. 

Stress Testing in 2025: Preparing Financial Institutions for Economic Volatility

As we enter 2025, financial institutions are navigating an increasingly complex and volatile economic environment. From fluctuating interest rates and inflation concerns to potential market disruptions, it’s more critical than ever for financial institutions to ensure they are prepared for economic shocks. One of the most effective ways to assess and mitigate risk is through stress testing. 

Stress testing, the process of simulating potential adverse economic conditions, helps financial institutions understand how their balance sheets and operations might react under extreme scenarios. This allows them to take proactive steps to manage risk and ensure they remain resilient during times of economic uncertainty. 

In this blog, we explore the importance of stress testing in 2025 and how financial institutions can use this tool to prepare for potential economic volatility. 

What is Stress Testing? 

Stress testing involves running simulations to model how a financial institution’s portfolio would perform under hypothetical, adverse conditions. These tests are typically focused on various economic scenarios, such as a severe recession, sudden interest rate hikes, market crashes, or systemic financial crises. 

Regulatory bodies like the Federal Reserve and OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) require certain financial institutions to conduct stress tests regularly to ensure they have adequate capital reserves to weather economic downturns. However, stress testing is not just a regulatory obligation—it’s a valuable tool for institutions to assess their internal risk management strategies and identify vulnerabilities. 

The Importance of Stress Testing in 2025 

As we move into 2025, stress testing will continue to be an essential component of financial institutions’ risk management strategies. The global economy remains in a period of uncertainty, with potential risks such as: 

  • Interest rate fluctuations: As central banks adjust rates in response to inflation or other economic factors, financial institutions must assess how these changes impact their capital and profitability. 
  • Inflationary pressures: Rising costs can affect consumer spending, corporate earnings, and overall economic growth, which can impact the financial health of institutions and their clients. 
  • Market volatility: Unpredictable market shifts, especially in the wake of global geopolitical events, can lead to significant volatility that affects financial institutions’ balance sheets. 
  • Credit risk: With economic uncertainty, the risk of borrowers defaulting on loans increases, impacting institutions with significant exposure to credit markets. 

Stress testing provides financial institutions with the ability to assess these risks in real time and prepare for various outcomes. It enables institutions to understand how different economic shocks would affect their operations, helping them identify weaknesses and take corrective actions in advance. 

Key Considerations for Financial Institutions 

1. Tailoring Stress Tests to Specific Risks 

While regulatory requirements often dictate certain stress test parameters, financial institutions should tailor their stress tests to reflect the unique risks they face. For example, a community bank with a high concentration of small business loans may need to stress test the effects of an economic slowdown on small business owners. Similarly, institutions with significant exposure to international markets may need to account for geopolitical risks in their stress scenarios. 

2. Incorporating Multiple Scenarios 

Financial institutions should run multiple stress scenarios to account for a range of potential risks. Some common scenarios to consider include: 

  • Adverse economic conditions (e.g., recession or stagflation) 
  • Interest rate hikes or cuts that could impact loan portfolios and capital adequacy 
  • Market disruptions that could affect liquidity and investments 
  • Pandemic or natural disaster scenarios that impact operations and loan repayment capabilities 

By considering a variety of scenarios, financial institutions can better prepare for a broader range of potential events and understand how their portfolio would perform under different circumstances. 

3. Assessing Capital Adequacy and Liquidity 

One of the primary objectives of stress testing is to assess an institution’s capital adequacy and liquidity in the face of economic adversity. It’s essential for financial institutions to determine whether they have sufficient reserves to absorb losses during periods of stress without jeopardizing their ability to operate. 

Stress tests can highlight potential capital shortfalls, liquidity issues, or areas where capital allocation needs to be adjusted. This allows institutions to take proactive steps, such as raising capital, diversifying investments, or adjusting their business models to mitigate these risks. 

4. Strengthening Governance and Risk Management 

Stress testing isn’t just about running simulations—it’s also about ensuring that governance structures and risk management processes are aligned to respond effectively to the results. Financial institutions should have clear plans for how to respond if stress test results indicate potential vulnerabilities. 

In addition to conducting stress tests, financial institutions should ensure that their risk management framework is equipped to handle the insights gained from these tests. This may involve adjusting business strategies, modifying credit policies, or bolstering internal controls. 

The Role of Technology in Stress Testing 

Advances in technology are helping financial institutions enhance their stress testing processes. The use of big data, AI, and machine learning can improve the accuracy of stress test models and enable institutions to simulate a wider variety of scenarios more quickly. 

For example, machine learning algorithms can analyze historical economic data to predict potential future risks with greater precision. Similarly, financial institutions can use cloud-based platforms to run real-time simulations and generate reports faster, enabling quicker decision-making and more effective risk management. 

Preparing for the Future 

As we look ahead to 2025 and beyond, it’s clear that stress testing will continue to play a crucial role in ensuring financial institutions are prepared for economic volatility. By investing in technology, customizing stress tests to their unique risks, and ensuring adequate capital reserves, financial institutions can safeguard their operations against future challenges. 

Now, more than ever, stress testing is not only about meeting regulatory requirements—it’s about building resilience and ensuring the long-term stability of financial institutions, regardless of what the future holds. 

How Brady Martz Can Help 

At Brady Martz, we assist financial institutions with comprehensive risk management strategies, including stress testing, capital adequacy analysis, and scenario modeling. Our team helps you assess potential vulnerabilities, optimize your capital structure, and ensure your institution is prepared for economic uncertainties in 2025 and beyond.